[Gajim-devel] whiteboard standardization

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue Mar 30 23:26:20 CEST 2010

On 3/22/10 3:15 AM, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> Le 22/03/2010 10:03, Michael Jurke a écrit :
>> Thanks for your fast response!!
>> As mentioned I'm aware of the standard proposals on jabbers website. Are
>> your sure gajim is based on SXDE
>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sxde.html??? It is outdated and gajim
>> first approach was based on it's follower SXE
>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sxe.html at least when I read the
>> mailing archive
>> (http://www.lagaule.org/pipermail/gajim-devel/2008-March/000356.html).
>> But how is it now? Any ideas or roadmaps? Or does it fully support SXE -
>> verbose and with not well handled session-negotiation?
> Oups yes of course our implementation is based on SXE, not SXDE. We use
> jingle for negotiation (it's why we couldn't test against psi, which
> doesn't use jingle).
> Current implementation works, I mean we can negociate a session, and
> share a drawing. Only a few tools are supported, but the basics are here.
> There is no roadmap for the moment, we prefere finishing 0.14 version
> with jingle, then 0.15 with plugin system.

BTW at IETF 77 last week I had a good meeting with someone who has
implemented SXE-based whiteboarding. He will be fixing up the protoXEP
and I hope the XSF will publish it (and the SXE-based whiteboarding
document) as numbered XEPs in the near future.


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://www.lagaule.org/pipermail/gajim-devel/attachments/20100330/87235848/attachment.bin>

More information about the Gajim-devel mailing list