[Gajim-devel] Fwd: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership
js-gajim at webkeks.org
Fri Dec 19 12:34:52 CET 2008
Here's a mail where OpenBSD states why they won't commit 0.12 into
their ports tree.
So much for "This is not a issue for users not using GPRS", Yann. And
so much for it's obvious how to disable it - it seems more like it
isn't obvious at all, as noone seemed to figure out for hisself what's
causing it and how to disable it. We need to release 0.12.1, and we
need to do that ASAP!
Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail:
> Von: Pierre-Emmanuel André <pea at raveland.org>
> Datum: 19. Dezember 2008 12:22:00 MEZ
> An: Simon Kuhnle <simon at blarzwurst.de>
> Kopie: ports at openbsd.org
> Betreff: Re: UPDATE: net/gajim to 0.12 and drop maintainership
> Le Wed, 17 Dec 2008 23:14:06 +0100,
> Simon Kuhnle <simon at blarzwurst.de> a écrit :
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 03:00:06PM +0100, Pierre-Emmanuel André
>>> Le Wed, 17 Dec 2008 10:45:34 +0100,
>>> Simon Kuhnle <simon at blarzwurst.de> a écrit :
>>>> finally the version 0.12 of Gajim is released.
>>>> Changelog: http://trac.gajim.org/browser/tags/gajim-0.12/ChangeLog
>>>> Thanks to Jonathan Schleifer, all patches are upstream.
>>>> With this update I'm dropping maintainership,
>>>> as I'm not really using gajim anymore, in favor of mcabber. Any
>>>> Besides 'make lib-depends-check' is telling me
>>>> Extra: aspell.17
>>>> everything seems to work fine on i386.
>>> You need to remove aspell from WANTLIB.
>> That did the job for me.
>>> Otherwise it looks good for me.
>>> I tested on @macppc, @sparc64 and @i386 with success. Btw, I can
>>> take the maintainership.
>> Very nice, thank you for testing and taking over.
>> I attached the diff with your address and the removed aspell.
> Thanks for your update Simon.
> I will not commit this update now: after a full day of testing, i've
> some regressions with this version.
> I tested with 3 accounts based on 3 differents servers(ichat server,
> ejabberd 1.1.2 and ejabberd 2.0.1) and i have a lot of deconnexions...
> If some gajim users read this thread, could you please test this
> and tells me if you see regressions ?
> Pierre-Emmanuel André <pea at raveland.org>
> GPG key: 0x7AE329DC
-------------- n?chster Teil --------------
Ein Dateianhang mit Bin?rdaten wurde abgetrennt...
Dateiname : PGP.sig
Dateityp : application/pgp-signature
Dateigr??e : 801 bytes
Beschreibung: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
URL : <http://www.lagaule.org/pipermail/gajim-devel/attachments/20081219/8b8f7111/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Gajim-devel