It&#39;s ok to disagree and let&#39;s not go off topic. ;P<br>I like SVN because it pushes you to commit online. I don&#39;t like keep branches for a long time either. I like all in one place. it works better because of psycology reasons I think :)<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:40 PM, Jonathan Schleifer &lt;<a href="mailto:js-gajim@webkeks.org">js-gajim@webkeks.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">&quot;Nikos Kouremenos&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:kourem@gmail.com">kourem@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; no svn is more than fine. centralization is good for managing<br>
&gt; software such as Gajim. Gajim is not Mozilla nor Apache<br>
<br>
</div>I *STRONGLY* disagree. Ever tried to work with SVN when you&#39;re in a<br>
train with your laptop, without any WLAN? You&#39;re screwed then. With<br>
mercurial, no problem at all. Just commit offline and push (and merge,<br>
if needed) when you come online again, no problem at all. With svn, you<br>
can&#39;t work offline. So, centralized VCS are *BAD*, *BAD* and *BAD*!<br>
<br>
--<br>
<font color="#888888">Jonathan<br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Gajim-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gajim-devel@gajim.org">Gajim-devel@gajim.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel" target="_blank">https://lists.gajim.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/gajim-devel</a><br></blockquote></div><br>